Here’s a concise primer on Rodrigo Duterte’s War on Drugs and how it led to charges at the International Criminal Court (ICC):
🚨 Duterte’s War on Drugs: A Primer for ICC Charges
🇵🇭 Background
-
In 2016, Rodrigo Duterte became President of the Philippines after campaigning on a hardline promise to “kill drug dealers.”
-
He had previously employed similar tactics as Mayor of Davao City, earning the nickname “The Punisher.”
-
Shortly after taking office, Duterte launched an aggressive nationwide anti-drug campaign, directing police and local officials to eliminate drug threats “by any means necessary.”
☠️ The Campaign in Numbers (2016–2019)
-
Estimated deaths:
-
6,000–8,000+ (official PNP figures)
-
12,000–30,000+ (human rights groups' estimates)
-
-
Majority of victims: Urban poor, often killed in alleged “nanlaban” (resisting arrest) incidents.
-
Key institutions involved:
-
Philippine National Police (PNP)
-
Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency (PDEA)
-
Local officials and alleged vigilante groups
-
⚖️ What the ICC Is Investigating
The ICC’s investigation centers on:
-
Crimes against humanity under Article 7 of the Rome Statute:
-
Murder
-
Torture
-
Other inhumane acts
-
-
Pattern of abuse: Widespread, systematic attacks against civilians
-
Timeframe: Nov 1, 2011 – Mar 16, 2019
-
Includes time when Duterte was Davao mayor and president
-
-
Command responsibility: Duterte is accused of:
-
Ordering or encouraging killings
-
Failing to prevent or punish abuses
-
📉 Domestic & International Response
-
Human rights groups (e.g., Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch) condemned the campaign.
-
Philippine Commission on Human Rights faced political resistance.
-
Duterte withdrew the Philippines from the ICC in 2019—but the court retains jurisdiction for crimes committed before withdrawal.
-
International criticism grew after reports of police falsifying reports and planting evidence.
🏛️ ICC Legal Milestones
-
2018: ICC opens preliminary examination
-
2021: Formal investigation approved
-
2025: Duterte arrested and extradited to The Hague
-
September 2025: Confirmation of charges hearings scheduled
🧭 Why It Matters
-
The ICC case tests the limits of international accountability for domestic crackdowns.
-
It’s a landmark case involving a former head of state for a campaign largely defended as domestic policy.
-
The outcome could shape future legal norms on human rights and state-sanctioned violence.
Post a Comment